這起新聞在中國網路上引發極大關注與討論。事件的核心人物是一名男子，他因妻子出軌而憤而整理出長達六十八頁的PPT，詳細披露妻子的學業、婚姻與情感狀況，並將其公開到網路上，引發社會輿論的激烈爭辯。

據了解，該名男子與妻子原本是夫妻關係，男子對妻子在學業上的支持相當投入，不僅曾為幫助妻子完成出國留學的夢想而賣掉房子，還花費六十萬元人民幣，資助妻子前往海外進修博士。然而，當妻子在國外攻讀博士期間，卻被男子發現有出軌行為。男子認為自己為婚姻和妻子的學業付出甚多，最終卻換來背叛，因此決定將事情完整整理成PPT，並以公開方式讓外界了解真相。

PPT中內容涉及妻子的個人經歷、時間線，甚至包括被指控的婚外情細節。由於材料詳盡、排版完整，甚至被網友戲稱為「學術級別的婚姻舉證」。事件一經曝光後，迅速在微博、知乎、抖音等平台引發熱烈討論。部分網友同情男子，認為他的付出與遭遇形成了極大的落差，也有人批評他將私人婚姻糾紛公開，涉及隱私問題，做法有失妥當。

隨著事件發酵，涉事女子被指系華南理工大學的博士在讀學生。校方很快對外回應，表示已對事件展開調查，並最終給予該名女博士「留校察看」的處分。這一處分意味著她仍可繼續學業，但若再有違紀行為，則可能面臨更嚴重的後果。

事件在輿論場上不僅僅是婚姻與背叛的情感問題，也牽扯到「出國留學資源分配」、「夫妻間經濟與情感投資」以及「校園倫理」等更廣泛的社會議題。一方面，有人認為這是一樁私人情感糾紛，無需被放大；另一方面，也有人指出，作為博士生理應具備更高的道德標準，若確有違背基本倫理的行為，則難免會影響校譽與公信力。

整體來看，這起「六十八頁PPT控訴妻子出軌」的事件，不僅是個人婚姻矛盾的爆發，更在社會層面引發對道德、責任、教育資源與隱私邊界的思考。華南理工大學的官方處理，暫時為這場風波劃下階段性句點，但社會輿論對此事件的探討與後續影響，仍將持續延燒。

This incident quickly became a heated topic on Chinese social media. At the center of the controversy is a man who, after discovering his wife’s infidelity, compiled a detailed 68-page PowerPoint presentation exposing her personal and marital history, as well as the alleged affair. He then made it public online, sparking widespread debate.

According to reports, the man had made significant sacrifices to support his wife’s academic pursuits. He even sold their home and spent around 600,000 RMB to fund her doctoral studies abroad. However, while she was pursuing her PhD overseas, he discovered she had been unfaithful. Feeling betrayed after years of financial and emotional investment, he decided to present his findings in a meticulously structured PPT, which outlined timelines, personal details, and accusations of extramarital involvement.

Because of the PPT’s professional layout and thorough evidence, some netizens jokingly described it as “academic-level proof of marital betrayal.” Once uploaded, it spread rapidly on platforms like Weibo, Zhihu, and Douyin. Online opinion was sharply divided: some sympathized with the man, criticizing the wife’s actions and expressing outrage over his sacrifices being met with betrayal. Others argued that making private marital disputes public was inappropriate, calling it an invasion of privacy.

The woman involved was identified as a current PhD student at South China University of Technology. The university responded swiftly, confirming that they had investigated the matter and imposed a “probationary observation” (留校察看) disciplinary action. This means she can continue her studies, but any further violations could lead to more severe punishment.

The case has extended beyond a personal marital conflict into larger societal discussions. It has raised questions about the ethics and responsibilities of doctoral students, the fairness of educational resource allocation, the role of financial and emotional investment in marriage, and the boundaries of privacy in the digital age.

Overall, this “68-page PPT exposing a wife’s infidelity” has become not only a sensational marital scandal but also a flashpoint for debate about morality, accountability, and the line between private and public matters. While the university’s decision marks a temporary conclusion institutionally, the social discourse surrounding the incident is likely to continue for some time.