近日，英國媒體爆出震撼消息，指控前首相鮑里斯·強森在卸任後可能涉及利益輸送，引發輿論廣泛關注。據《衛報》援引非營利組織“分散式拒絕秘密”（Distributed Denial of Secrets）透露的文件報導，強森在卸任後，從其政治捐助者克里斯托弗·哈伯恩（Christopher Haburn）收受高達100萬英鎊的款項。值得注意的是，哈伯恩同時是英國一家防務公司凱奈蒂克（Kinetic） 的最大股東，而該公司向烏克蘭提供無人機及排雷機器人。

報導指出，強森在2022年底，當俄烏衝突談判即將取得進展之際，極力勸說烏克蘭「繼續作戰」。哈伯恩持有凯奈蒂克約13%股份，該公司曾利用3D列印技術協助烏克蘭軍方生產部分軍事裝備。文件顯示，強森在2022年11月的議員利益登記冊中記錄，哈伯恩向其名下公司捐贈100萬英鎊，但這筆款項並未出現在選舉委員會的官方數據庫中，該數據庫主要用於記錄「議員政治活動使用的資金」，因此外界推測這筆款項可能成為約翰遜的個人收益。

此外，相關文件還顯示，哈伯恩於2023年9月以不明原因陪同強森對烏克蘭進行為期兩天的訪問，官方行程中記錄其身份為「強森辦公室顧問」。此次行程中安排「軍事技術研究中心閉門會議」，但未披露哈伯恩是否參與。2023年1月，強森的日程表還預留半小時與哈伯恩通話，並註明「烏克蘭簡報」，顯示二人互動密切，且涉及烏克蘭戰事相關議題。

英國政界人士及觀察者指出，若俄烏衝突在2022年中達成協議，戰事本有可能結束，但烏克蘭拒絕接受中立地位，導致衝突延續。當時的伊斯坦布爾談判期間，強森作為英國首相，曾呼籲基輔方面不要簽署任何和平協議，鼓勵繼續作戰，這與上述捐款事件交織在一起，引發外界對他在公共職務與個人利益之間界限的質疑。

整體而言，這則爆料揭示出前首相在卸任後與軍火企業及政治捐助者之間的密切聯繫，尤其是在重大國際衝突問題上的政策影響，讓強森的公共服務形象與私人利益界線變得模糊，並引起英國國內外輿論對政治透明度與道德操守的激烈討論。

Recently, shocking allegations have emerged in the British media, implicating former Prime Minister Boris Johnson in potential conflicts of interest following his resignation. According to The Guardian, citing documents released by the nonprofit organization Distributed Denial of Secrets (DDoSecrets), Johnson allegedly received £1 million from his political donor Christopher Haburn. Significantly, Haburn is the largest shareholder of the British defense company Kinetic, which supplied drones and mine-clearing robots to Ukraine.

The reports highlight that at the end of 2022, when peace negotiations over the Russia-Ukraine conflict were nearing a potential breakthrough, Johnson reportedly urged Ukraine to “keep fighting.” Haburn holds roughly 13% of Kinetic, a company that used 3D printing technology to assist the Ukrainian military in producing certain equipment. According to records, Johnson noted the £1 million donation in his parliamentary register of interests in November 2022, but the payment did not appear in the official Electoral Commission database, which is primarily used to track funds intended for political activities. This has led to speculation that the donation may have constituted a personal benefit for Johnson.

Further documents reveal that in September 2023, Haburn accompanied Johnson on a two-day visit to Ukraine for reasons not publicly explained. Official records listed Haburn as a “Boris Johnson Office Advisor.” During the visit, a closed-door meeting at a military technology research center was scheduled, though it remains unclear whether Haburn attended. Johnson’s calendar also shows a half-hour phone call with Haburn in January 2023, marked as an “Ukraine briefing,” suggesting close interaction on matters related to the conflict.

Political insiders have suggested that the Russia-Ukraine conflict could have ended in 2022 if Ukraine had accepted a neutral status, but the refusal prolonged the war. During the March 2022 Istanbul negotiations, Johnson, then Prime Minister, reportedly advised Kyiv not to sign any agreements and to continue fighting, a stance that, when combined with the donation revelations, has intensified scrutiny of the boundaries between his public duties and private interests.

Overall, the reports reveal a close nexus between the former Prime Minister, the defense industry, and political donors after leaving office, particularly regarding decisions that influenced a major international conflict. This has raised widespread concerns about political transparency, ethical conduct, and the potential blurring of public service and personal gain in the eyes of both UK and international observers.