事發地點位於柬埔寨的西港，一名南韓男子長期被困於當地的詐騙園區，遭受嚴密監控與暴力威脅。為了求生，他不顧自身安危，冒著極大風險逃離園區，徒步或搭乘交通工具歷經長時間輾轉，終於在凌晨六時抵達首都金邊的南韓大使館，希望能立即獲得保護與協助。

然而，男子的求助卻遭遇冷遇。根據他提供的錄音與訪談內容，館方職員僅以「早上八時才開門」為由拒絕入內。即使男子多次哀求，甚至解釋自己身處生命危險之中，職員仍要求他在館外等待。男子在寒冷與疲憊中徘徊近兩小時，心中充滿恐懼與焦慮，擔心隨時會被園區的人發現並抓回，精神幾近崩潰。

據《韓聯社》報導，男子在逃亡過程中曾多次試圖提前聯絡大使館尋求接應，但館方要求他提供具體位置與照片作為確認。由於當時身處高監控環境，他無法安全提供這些信息，無奈只能在外面徘徊等待。整個過程凸顯出詐騙園區對受害者的高壓控制，以及逃生者在求助時可能面臨的行政障礙與無力感。

事件曝光後，南韓社會反應強烈，引發輿論熱議。民眾普遍質疑外交單位對突發危機的應變能力和對國民安全的保護意識，認為在跨國緊急事件中，大使館應具備更靈活的接待與救助機制，而不應僅依照固定上班時間行事。這起事件也提醒社會，面對海外詐騙與人口販賣，受害者的生命安全應被放在首位，而政府與外交機構在危機處置上需要更快速、有效的應對措施，以防止類似悲劇再次發生。

This incident highlights the tension between transnational scam operations and diplomatic response mechanisms, while also exposing the extreme psychological pressure and helplessness faced by victims attempting to escape life-threatening situations. The case took place in Sihanoukville (West Port), Cambodia, where a South Korean man had been trapped in a scam compound, subjected to strict surveillance and threats of violence. Risking his life, he managed to flee the facility, traveling through the night and early morning, and arrived at the South Korean Embassy in Phnom Penh at around 6 a.m., seeking immediate protection and assistance.

However, his plea for help was met with bureaucratic rigidity. According to audio recordings and statements provided by the man, embassy staff initially refused to admit him, citing that the office does not open until 8 a.m. Despite repeated appeals and explanations of the imminent danger he faced, the embassy insisted he wait outside. For nearly two hours, he wandered outside in exhaustion and fear, worried that agents from the scam compound might discover him and force him back, leaving him in a state of near-psychological collapse.

The Yonhap News Agency reported that during his escape, the man had attempted to contact the embassy in advance to arrange assistance. Embassy staff, however, required him to provide precise location details and photographs for verification. Trapped under constant surveillance in the scam compound, he was unable to safely provide such information, leaving him with no choice but to wait outside. This situation underscores both the high level of control exercised by scam syndicates over their victims and the administrative obstacles that survivors can face even when seeking urgent help.

The incident sparked widespread outrage in South Korea, with public criticism directed at the embassy’s apparent lack of flexibility and crisis-response awareness. Citizens questioned the diplomatic corps’ capacity to prioritize the safety of nationals abroad, arguing that embassies should implement more adaptive and rapid-response protocols during emergencies rather than strictly adhering to office hours. The case serves as a stark reminder that in situations involving overseas scams or human trafficking, the protection of life must take precedence, and government institutions must ensure that victims can access immediate aid to prevent potential tragedies.