2025年11月21日至23日，烏克蘭總統澤連斯基就美俄秘密起草的《二十八條和平計畫》在全國發表系列講話，明確表態拒絕接受任何損害烏克蘭主權與尊嚴的條款，強調將提出替代方案，堅守國家利益與核心紅線。

據悉，這份由美俄秘密協商制定的和平計畫要求烏克蘭承認俄羅斯對克里米亞及烏東地區的控制，將軍隊裁減至60萬人，禁止加入北約，並以解除對俄制裁作為交換條件。計畫中還涉及烏克蘭凍結資產的分配，其中美方將獲取一半利潤，以及允許俄羅斯重返G8等安排。澤連斯基對此斥責為“投降協議”，強調這些條款嚴重損害烏克蘭的主權與國家利益。

在系列講話中，澤連斯基表態強硬，指出烏克蘭不會以犧牲尊嚴和自由換取“虛假的和平”。他援引2019年總統就職誓言，再次重申捍衛國家主權與領土完整的立場。澤連斯基批評該計畫未尊重烏克蘭作為主體國家的參與權，實質上是“大國交易”，並警告如果接受其中條款，烏克蘭將可能成為國際政治的“犧牲品”。

同時，澤連斯基表示將與美國及歐洲盟友保持冷靜協商，提出替代和平方案，但明確劃定“尊嚴與自由”為不可逾越的紅線。他預告，未來一週將面臨關鍵談判，包括與前美國總統特朗普的直接對話，並呼籲國內停止政治內鬥，團結一致應對國家危機。

國際社會對此事件反應不一。多個歐洲國家對美俄秘密協議表示不滿，擔心計畫可能破壞歐洲安全架構；美國內部對方案態度亦存在矛盾，國務卿魯比奧稱其為“談判框架”，但部分議員質疑其合法性。分析人士指出，如果烏克蘭妥協，可能助長俄羅斯的地緣政治野心，並動搖國際秩序；若堅決拒絕，則可能面臨美方斷援風險，進一步加劇戰場壓力。

總體而言，這場圍繞《二十八條和平計畫》的事件，不僅凸顯烏克蘭在國際談判中維護主權的堅定立場，也揭示了美俄在背後推動和平方案的複雜博弈，對地區安全與國際秩序產生深遠影響。

From November 21 to 23, 2025, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy delivered a series of nationwide speeches addressing the secretly drafted “28-Point Peace Plan” negotiated between the United States and Russia. He firmly rejected any provisions that would undermine Ukraine’s sovereignty and dignity, emphasizing that Kyiv would propose alternative measures while steadfastly defending its national interests and core red lines.

According to reports, the plan demanded that Ukraine recognize Russia’s control over Crimea and the eastern regions, reduce its military to 600,000 personnel, refrain from joining NATO, and lift sanctions on Russia in exchange. Additional provisions involved the allocation of frozen Ukrainian assets—half of which would go to the U.S.—as well as Russia’s readmission to the G8. Zelenskyy denounced these terms as a “surrender agreement,” stressing that they gravely compromised Ukraine’s sovereignty and national interests.

In his speeches, Zelenskyy took a strong stance, stating that Ukraine would not trade its dignity and freedom for a “false peace.” He invoked his 2019 presidential inauguration pledge to reaffirm his commitment to defending Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Zelenskyy criticized the plan for failing to respect Ukraine’s participation as a sovereign state, calling it a transaction between great powers, and warned that accepting the terms could turn Ukraine into a “political sacrifice.”

At the same time, Zelenskyy announced that Kyiv would engage in calm negotiations with the United States and European allies to propose an alternative peace plan, but he drew a firm line on “dignity and freedom” as non-negotiable. He indicated that key discussions would take place in the coming week, including direct dialogue with former U.S. President Donald Trump, and he urged domestic political factions to halt internal disputes and unite in facing the national crisis.

International reactions have been mixed. Several European countries expressed displeasure over the U.S.-Russia secret deal, fearing it could undermine the European security framework. Within the United States, officials were divided: Secretary of State Rubio described the plan as a “negotiation framework,” while some lawmakers questioned its legitimacy. Analysts note that if Ukraine were to compromise, it could embolden Russia’s geopolitical ambitions and destabilize international order; conversely, rejecting the plan could risk U.S. aid suspension and increase pressure on the battlefield.

Overall, the controversy surrounding the 28-Point Peace Plan highlights Ukraine’s firm stance on safeguarding its sovereignty in international negotiations while also exposing the complex strategic maneuvering between the U.S. and Russia. The outcome has significant implications for regional security and the broader international order.