馬斯克宣布成立「美國黨」(America Party)

2025-07-10

馬斯克近日公開宣布成立「美國黨」(America Party),在聲稱要「為你們奪回自由」的同時,也掀起美國政壇的一場驚濤駭浪。這舉動並非出於純粹的理想主義,而被廣泛解讀為他謀求政治影響力的一部分策略。過去,他的政治動能幾乎完全來自與川普的密切關係,如今透過成立新政黨並大量提名候選人,他顯然意圖擾亂共和黨的選情佈局,藉此獲取更直接的權力基礎。

美國黨的成立對現有兩黨體系構成挑戰,也暗示一種新的政治遊戲規則。這些候選人若能在共和黨與民主黨之間吸納關鍵選票,將可能導致選戰結果出人意表。透過削弱共和黨勝選的機會,甚至在某些選區成功奪走一兩個席次,馬斯克便能以新政黨之姿,促使共和黨不得不針對他的利益做出讓步,例如順應SpaceX、特斯拉或社交媒體公司X的政策訴求、推動有利於其事業的補貼與立法。

值得注意的是,馬斯克的商業帝國長期依賴政府合作與資助,從航空太空到電動車都與聯邦與州資助脫不了關係。因此,他的政治野心很可能與經濟利益息息相關:透過掌握選舉權利或左右選局,他不僅可以改寫公司未來的經營環境,也能推動有利於自己版圖擴張的政策。

然而,此舉也引發廣泛憂慮。批評者警告,馬斯克若真能操控或左右某些選區的選情,可能將科技財閥的勢力直接帶入國會,創造出「科技寡頭主義」。與此同時,這樣的政治操盤更可能進一步削弱共和黨本身的凝聚力,也可能為競爭激烈的選區投下不穩定的變數。此外,美國的政治捐款與選戰法規複雜,如果美國黨成真,對於資金流向與政治倫理的監督問題將急遽升溫。

綜合來看,馬斯克創黨之舉並非偶然,而是精心設計的博弈策略。它或許將開啟以企業影響力為核心的新政治時代,而非單純的意識形態訴求。究竟美國黨能否在未來的選戰中真正崛起?它對共和黨的傳統陣營會造成多大威脅?最終還是否能成功左右立法方向?這些問題正在攪動美國政治的未來樣貌,值得所有人持續注視。

Elon Musk recently made headlines by officially announcing the formation of the “American Party,” declaring that its purpose is to “give you your freedom back.” This dramatic move has sent shockwaves through the U.S. political establishment and is widely interpreted not as a purely idealistic gesture, but as part of a calculated strategy to expand Musk’s political influence. Until now, his political momentum has largely stemmed from his close association with Donald Trump. But with the creation of a new political party and a broad slate of candidates, Musk appears intent on disrupting the Republican Party’s electoral map and building a more direct base of power.

The launch of the America Party represents a direct challenge to the traditional two-party system and suggests the emergence of a new political playbook. Should Musk’s candidates successfully siphon off crucial votes between Republicans and Democrats, they could significantly alter the outcome of key elections. By weakening the Republican Party’s chances in tight races—or even winning a few seats outright—Musk would be able to pressure the GOP into supporting policies favorable to his business empire, including legislation and subsidies that benefit SpaceX, Tesla, and his social media platform X.

It is important to note that Musk’s business ventures have long depended on federal and state cooperation and funding. From aerospace to electric vehicles, his enterprises are closely tied to public contracts and government programs. This makes it highly likely that his political ambitions are closely aligned with economic interests: by influencing the electoral process, Musk could shape a policy environment that is more favorable to the expansion of his corporate domain.

However, this political gambit has sparked significant concern. Critics warn that if Musk succeeds in swaying election outcomes in certain districts, it could result in an unprecedented level of corporate influence in Congress—raising the specter of “technocratic oligarchy.” Furthermore, such manipulation of the political landscape could fracture the Republican Party’s unity and inject volatility into already competitive electoral contests. Given the complex web of U.S. campaign finance laws, the rise of the American Party would also intensify scrutiny over political donations, ethical standards, and regulatory oversight.

 

All things considered, Musk’s creation of a political party is no accident—it is a carefully engineered strategic move. It may signal the beginning of a new era in American politics, one driven less by ideology and more by corporate influence. Whether the America Party can emerge as a real force in future elections, how deeply it will disrupt the Republican base, and whether it can ultimately shape legislative outcomes—these remain open questions. But what is certain is that Musk’s political maneuvering is already reshaping the trajectory of American democracy and demands close public attention.