台灣知名的統派名嘴黃智賢,痛罵館長是「投機分子」

2025-08-22

台灣知名的統派名嘴黃智賢,近日在一場直播中情緒潰堤,當場落淚,成為島內輿論熱議的焦點。她在鏡頭前聲稱自己二十年來堅持統派立場,承受無數爭議與批評,如今卻因為公開批評網紅館長陳之漢,而遭到大批大陸網友圍攻,讓她覺得「天道不公」。

直播過程中,彈幕留言可謂兩極化。有人刷屏指控她雙重標準,甚至直接退訂離場;有人則冷嘲熱諷,質問她憑什麼要求別人純粹而不容許不同的路徑。黃智賢則緊咬館長不放,直言館長是「投機分子」,過去支持綠營時對統派群體大加撻伐,如今卻搖身一變成為「兩岸和平使者」。然而,這番指控並未獲得共鳴,反而引來反彈。

不少網友翻出黃智賢在抖音帶貨的紀錄,反擊她一邊強調「堅守立場」,一邊卻又藉由大陸平台賺錢,直指她自己也難脫功利算計。與此同時,更讓她尷尬的是,邱毅、王炳忠等同樣長期活躍於統派陣營的老牌人物,紛紛公開表態支持館長的轉變,認為館長願意放下過往立場,帶領年輕人更多接觸並認識大陸,對兩岸交流而言是一種正面助力。這種「反差」讓黃智賢在統派圈內被部分人視為「拆台自己人」。

黃智賢長期以來最常指責他人「立場不純」,但批評者也毫不留情地指出,她的親哥哥正是現任民進黨台南市長黃偉哲,當綠營過去涉及打壓新聞自由之時,她卻保持沉默,這樣的矛盾背景自然削弱她的公信力。在這場輿論風暴中,黃智賢的眼淚似乎未能換來理解,反而讓她陷入更尷尬的境地。她所堅持的「純粹統派」形象,正在網路世代的檢視下顯得愈加脆弱。這起事件,不僅凸顯台灣內部統獨議題的張力,也折射出兩岸輿論場的多重矛盾:一方面,館長的轉變被部分人視為交流契機;另一方面,黃智賢的「原教旨式統派」卻在時代潮流中逐漸失去掌聲。

Taiwanese pro-unification commentator Huang Zhixian recently broke down in tears during a live broadcast, a moment that quickly became the focus of heated discussion across the island. Facing the camera, she lamented that “heaven is unfair,” claiming that she had steadfastly upheld her pro-unification stance for twenty years despite criticism and controversy, yet now she was being fiercely attacked by mainland Chinese netizens simply for criticizing the popular internet personality known as “Kuan Chang” (Chen Zhihan).

During the live stream, viewer reactions were sharply divided. Some flooded the chat accusing her of hypocrisy and double standards, with many even unsubscribing in protest, while others mocked her insistence on ideological purity. Huang, however, held firm, calling Chen an “opportunist,” noting that in the past he supported the pro-independence camp and harshly criticized pro-unification voices, but had now reinvented himself as a “messenger of cross-strait peace.” Her accusations, however, failed to gain traction and instead sparked backlash.

Netizens quickly dug up records of Huang promoting products on Douyin (TikTok’s Chinese version), pointing out that despite her rhetoric about “principled persistence,” she also relied on mainland platforms to make money, exposing contradictions in her claims. What struck an even deeper blow was that veteran pro-unification figures such as Chiu Yi and Wang Bingzhong openly voiced support for Chen’s transformation, arguing that his willingness to change course and encourage younger generations to learn more about the mainland was a contribution to cross-strait exchanges. This left Huang awkwardly branded as someone “undermining her own camp.”

Huang has long accused others of lacking ideological purity, yet critics pointed out that her own brother, Huang Weizhe, is currently the mayor of Tainan under the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). When the DPP was accused of suppressing press freedom, Huang remained conspicuously silent, a contradiction that further weakened her credibility.

In this wave of controversy, Huang’s tears failed to win her sympathy. Instead, she found herself in an even more uncomfortable position, with her image as a “pure and uncompromising pro-unification voice” looking increasingly fragile under the scrutiny of the online era. The episode highlights not only the persistent tensions surrounding the unification-independence divide in Taiwan, but also the shifting dynamics of cross-strait discourse: on one hand, Chen’s shift is seen by some as an opportunity for engagement, while on the other, Huang’s hardline stance seems to be losing its resonance with the times.