大陸一名男子用P圖詐騙7名女子
一名男子利用修圖與假身份,在社交平台上偽裝成所謂的「金主」,打著「包養」的名義來接近女性。他開出的條件相當誘人:每月提供高達二十五萬元新台幣的生活費,並且聲稱自己是真誠而直接,不會空口畫大餅。這樣的說辭,對部分心存僥倖或急於改善生活的女性而言,確實帶來不小的誘惑。
其中一位受害者李女士,在看到這樣的邀約後,心想「值得一試」,於是便與這位自稱「張某」的男子聯繫。張某巧妙地營造出「有錢金主」的假象,甚至拿出所謂的「見面禮」,如金條與蘋果手機,來增加可信度。然而,這些看似奢華的禮物全都是假貨,唯一是真的,就是李女士自己掏錢買來、用來回送「金主」的酒。換言之,她不僅沒有得到承諾中的金錢支持,反而倒貼實打實的財物。
警方調查發現,這並非單一案例。短短兩個月內,就有七名女性在相似的情境下受騙。這名男子靠著虛構的身份與精心包裝的謊言,成功地讓多名女子誤以為自己遇上「多金恩客」。然而最終,這場「包養夢」只是一場精心設計的圈套。
事件之所以引起網友的熱議,除了對於女子受騙的惋惜之外,更多的是對騙局本身的荒謬感到哭笑不得。一邊是假金條、假手機,一邊是真實花錢買來的高檔酒,這種「空手套白狼」的伎倆看似低劣,卻依然能在短時間內騙到七個人。這凸顯出在網路社交環境中,誘惑與陷阱並存,人心稍有貪念或輕信,便可能落入圈套。
整件事最諷刺的是,所謂的「金主」從頭到尾不過是一場幻影,真正被「包養」的,反而是騙子本人。這也提醒大眾,面對看似天上掉下來的好處時,更應保持理性與警覺,否則一時心動,換來的很可能就是人財兩失。
A man, using photo editing and a fake identity, posed as a so-called “sugar daddy” on social media platforms. He dangled a tempting offer: a monthly allowance of 250,000 NTD, claiming he was straightforward and not someone who would make empty promises. Such conditions naturally appealed to some women who either hoped for a windfall or were eager to improve their lifestyle.
One victim, Ms. Li, upon seeing this offer, thought it was “worth a try” and contacted the man, who introduced himself as “Mr. Zhang.” Zhang skillfully created the illusion of being wealthy, even presenting supposed “meeting gifts” like gold bars and iPhones to enhance his credibility. Yet all of these lavish presents turned out to be fake. The only thing real was the expensive liquor that Ms. Li herself had purchased as a return gift for her “benefactor.” In the end, instead of receiving the promised financial support, she actually lost money.
Police later discovered that this was not an isolated case. Within just two months, seven women had fallen for similar scams. By fabricating a glamorous identity and weaving lies with care, the man successfully convinced multiple victims that they had met a generous patron. But in reality, the so-called “sugar daddy” was nothing more than a con artist.
The case sparked heated discussion online. Beyond sympathy for the women who were deceived, many netizens were struck by the sheer ridiculousness of the scam itself. On one hand, the gold bars and iPhones were fake; on the other, the liquor bought by the women was very real. This “something for nothing” trick might sound crude, yet it still managed to fool seven people in a short time. It highlights how, in today’s online social environment, temptation and traps coexist. When greed or blind trust gets the better of someone, it’s easy to fall into a snare.
The most ironic part of all is that the supposed “sugar daddy” never existed—the only one truly being “supported” was the scammer himself. This incident serves as a reminder: when something seems too good to be true, it usually is. A moment of wishful thinking can easily end in financial loss and bitter regret.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4