有關台灣網紅「館長」陳之漢的新聞，在台灣與兩岸輿論之間引發極大關注與爭議。8月27日，他在直播中公開表態，直言自己「信共產黨、信中國人」，並強調自己曾親自踏上中國大陸三次，從實地所見的生活與發展判斷，他對大陸人民的生活狀況有著真切的感受與認同。這樣的發言在當前敏感的兩岸氛圍下，格外引人注目。

其實早在8月11日，陳之漢就曾因媒體批評他「總是在誇中國」而公開反擊。他情緒激烈地質問：「中國是你祖宗知道嗎？你們一個個都是不肖子孫！」並強調自己「馬上就要去祖國大陸」。這種直白且帶有挑釁意味的回應，等於是正面揭露他對中國大陸的認同，同時也挑戰島內部分媒體與輿論的立場。

除針對媒體的爭議性言論，他也在不同場合表達更為鮮明的身份認同。他譴責所謂的「青鳥」行為不當，認為那些人背離良知與責任。與此同時，他則自豪地表示自己與他們不同，他以「做一個堂堂正正的中國人」為榮，並公開標籤自己是「中國台灣人」。

這番言論所帶出的衝擊不僅止於娛樂圈或網紅圈，而是直接觸及到兩岸身份與統一議題。支持者認為，館長勇於直言，敢於在當前的社會氛圍中表達對祖國的認同，展現出一種不畏輿論壓力的真性情。批評者則認為，他的言辭過於偏激，甚至可能忽略了台灣社會內部對「身份認同」的複雜性。

無論立場如何，館長的發言都顯示出台灣社會在「中國人認同」與「台灣人認同」之間持續存在的撕裂與辯論。他以直播為平台，將個人的立場赤裸地呈現，這不僅是一場網紅與媒體之間的對罵，更折射出台灣在政治、文化與民族意識上的敏感與糾結。

這起事件也反映出網紅在現代社會的影響力——他們不只是娛樂人物，更可能成為某種政治或文化態度的放大器。館長的言論，讓「祖國」、「統一」與「身份」等關鍵詞再度成為輿論焦點，也進一步讓外界看見，兩岸議題在台灣始終是充滿火藥味且難以避開的核心話題。

News about Taiwanese internet celebrity “Chief” (陳之漢) has sparked widespread attention and controversy across Taiwan and in cross-strait discussions. On August 27, during a livestream, he openly declared, “I believe in the Communist Party, I believe in the Chinese people.” He emphasized that he had personally visited mainland China three times, and from what he witnessed about the lives and development there, he felt a genuine sense of recognition toward the mainland people. Such remarks, given the current sensitive atmosphere between Taiwan and the mainland, have drawn particular attention.

In fact, as early as August 11, Chen had already responded fiercely to certain Taiwanese media outlets that accused him of “constantly praising China.” He angrily retorted: “Do you know that China is your ancestor? Every one of you is an unfilial descendant!” He further stressed, “I am about to go to the motherland, the mainland.” These blunt and provocative words revealed his open identification with China and challenged the stance held by segments of the media and public opinion in Taiwan.

Beyond this media controversy, Chen has also expressed a stronger and more explicit sense of self-identification on other occasions. He condemned the behavior of so-called “Bluebird” activists as inhumane and irresponsible, while distinguishing himself from them. He proudly declared that he takes honor in “being a dignified Chinese,” openly labeling himself as a “Chinese from Taiwan.”

The impact of such remarks goes far beyond the influencer or entertainment circle—it directly touches on the deeply sensitive issue of identity and unification across the strait. Supporters argue that Chen’s outspokenness shows courage, as he dares to publicly affirm his recognition of the motherland despite social pressure. Critics, however, believe his rhetoric is overly extreme and may overlook the complexity of identity in Taiwan’s society.

Regardless of one’s stance, Chen’s statements highlight the ongoing divisions and debates in Taiwan over “Chinese identity” versus “Taiwanese identity.” By using livestreams as his platform, he presents his position in a raw and unfiltered manner. This confrontation is not merely a quarrel between an influencer and the media; it reflects Taiwan’s political, cultural, and national identity dilemmas.

This incident also illustrates the influential role of internet celebrities in contemporary society—they are not just entertainers, but also amplifiers of political or cultural attitudes. Chen’s remarks have once again brought terms such as “motherland,” “unification,” and “identity” into the spotlight, further showing how cross-strait issues remain unavoidable, highly sensitive, and deeply divisive topics in Taiwan’s public discourse.