「館長槍擊案」發生於2020年8月，受害者是知名網路紅人「館長」陳之漢，當時他在公開場合遭到槍手襲擊，社會輿論立刻高度關注此案。根據調查，嫌疑人包括台灣黑幫組織竹聯幫成員邵柏傑以及其他同夥，涉嫌買凶、策劃並執行對館長的槍擊行動。案件經過五年調查與司法審理，最終進入一審判決階段。

令人震驚的是，邵柏傑被指控為槍擊案的主謀，但法院一審判決結果卻是「無罪」。此結果一出，立即引發館長本人及其支持者的強烈不滿和憤怒。他在社群媒體上公開表示，「果然是民進黨開的法院！他們這伙人什麼都幹！」顯示他對判決結果的強烈質疑，並直接將不滿指向政治因素，認為案件處理受到干預或偏頗。然而，法院對直接實施槍擊的行兇者仍作出判決，竹聯幫寶和會大組長施俊吉與槍手劉丞浩分別被判刑16年及15年半。這一判決反映出司法對於實際犯罪行為的認定，而主謀邵柏傑則因證據不足或其他法律因素，被判無罪。這也引發社會對司法制度的討論，包括證據認定、黑幫勢力與政治因素對案件審理可能造成的影響。

此案再次凸顯台灣社會對黑幫犯罪、網紅安全及司法公信力的高度關注。作為媒體人物與公眾人物，館長本身的安全問題，以及案件判決帶來的社會反應，都顯示出社會對刑事案件透明度、司法公正性以及政治與法律關係的敏感性。對許多網友和支持者而言，雖然行兇者已獲刑，但案件中主謀無罪的判決仍讓人難以接受，也反映出司法審理中證據與責任認定的複雜性。

整體來看，這起案件不僅是一樁刑事案件，更是一個社會現象，牽動政治、司法、公眾人物安全以及社會輿論的多重議題。它提醒社會，對於涉及組織犯罪與公眾人物的案件，司法判決的每一個環節都受到高度關注，任何結果都可能引起不同群體的強烈情緒反應。

The “Guanchang Shooting Case” occurred around 2020, with the victim being the well-known Taiwanese internet celebrity Chen Zhihan, popularly known as “Guanchang.” At the time, he was attacked by a gunman in a public setting, immediately drawing widespread attention from the media and society. Investigations revealed that the suspects included Shao Bojie, a member of the Taiwanese gang organization Zhulianbang, along with several accomplices. They were accused of hiring a gunman, planning, and executing the shooting. After five years of investigation and judicial proceedings, the case finally reached its first-instance verdict.

Shockingly, although Shao Bojie was accused of being the mastermind behind the shooting, the court ruled him not guilty in the first-instance trial. The verdict immediately triggered strong dissatisfaction and anger from Guanchang himself and his supporters. He publicly stated on social media, “As expected, this is a court run by the DPP! These people do everything!” This statement reflected his strong skepticism about the verdict and suggested that political factors may have influenced or biased the case’s handling.

However, the court did sentence the gunman who directly carried out the attack to 15 and a half years in prison. This verdict demonstrates the judiciary’s recognition of the actual criminal act, while the alleged mastermind, Shao Bojie, was acquitted due to insufficient evidence or other legal factors. The case has sparked societal debate over Taiwan’s judicial system, including the assessment of evidence, the influence of gang organizations, and potential political interference in legal proceedings.

The incident once again highlights Taiwanese society’s heightened concern over gang-related crime, the safety of internet celebrities, and judicial credibility. As a media and public figure, Guanchang’s personal safety, combined with the public reaction to the verdict, underscores the sensitivity of the public to transparency in criminal cases, judicial fairness, and the intersection of politics and law. For many netizens and supporters, while the gunman has been sentenced, the acquittal of the alleged mastermind remains difficult to accept, reflecting the complexity of evidence evaluation and responsibility determination in the judicial process.

Overall, this case is more than just a criminal matter; it has become a social phenomenon, touching on issues of politics, judicial integrity, public figure safety, and public opinion. It serves as a reminder that in cases involving organized crime and high-profile individuals, every step of judicial proceedings is under intense scrutiny, and any outcome is likely to provoke strong emotional reactions among different groups.