美國國土安全部（DHS）近日因一段短片引發巨大爭議。影片內容將抓捕非法移民的行動包裝成《寶可夢》（Pokémon）的風格，不僅搭配經典主題曲，還使用「Gotta catch ’em all」（把他們全抓到）等口號，甚至在結尾以「寶可夢卡片」形式呈現被捕者資訊。這段影片一經上傳，立即被網民批評為把嚴肅的執法行為娛樂化，甚至是將人命去人性化的處理方式，引起輿論廣泛反彈。

事件迅速延燒到智慧財產權層面。《寶可夢公司》第一時間公開澄清，強調自己未曾授權，也不允許國土安全部使用旗下配樂或視覺元素。公司嚴正表態與該影片毫無關聯，這不僅突顯政府單位可能存在侵權行為，也讓事件從社會輿論延伸到法律討論，特別是版權與商業使用規範的爭議。

社會反應方面，人權團體與移民支持組織猛烈抨擊，認為將抓捕比喻為「抓小精靈」是對弱勢群體的污名化，恐助長公眾的冷漠與偏見。法律與傳媒學者則提醒，若政府將執法成果當成娛樂化的宣傳素材，不僅傷害程序正義，也可能成為政治操弄的工具。部分支持執法者則認為，政府需要對外展示執法成效，但也同意表達方式過於戲謔，難以維持公信力。

政治層面上，這起事件被放大檢視。美國移民政策本就是高度爭議的焦點，影片一出立刻給反對者留下口實，批評政府在處理敏感議題時態度草率。部分國會議員與公民團體要求國土安全部公開說明影片製作過程，並調查責任人，甚至不排除追究法律責任。

法律問題同樣不容忽視。未經授權使用受保護的影音素材，若涉及宣傳或政治用途，往往構成侵權。再加上影片呈現了被捕者的影像與資訊，可能涉及隱私或名譽侵害。外界普遍認為，作為政府部門，應遵循更高標準，任何錯誤都可能嚴重損害社會對公共機構的信任。

整體來看，這起爭議不僅僅是單純的「短片用錯素材」事件，而是牽動著多重層面：一方面涉及版權與法律責任，另一方面更凸顯政府在數位時代下如何負責任地傳達公共訊息的難題。事件最終會如何收場仍待觀察，但已經為美國社會敲響警鐘──面對敏感的移民議題，政府必須更加謹慎，避免娛樂化處理，以免損害人性尊嚴與公信力。

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has come under fire after releasing a controversial video that portrayed illegal immigration arrests in the style of Pokémon. The clip used the franchise’s iconic theme song and catchphrase “Gotta catch ’em all,” even presenting detainees’ information in the form of Pokémon trading cards. The video was quickly condemned by critics who argued it trivialized serious enforcement actions and dehumanized migrants.

The Pokémon Company swiftly responded, stressing that it had never authorized the use of its music or imagery and firmly distanced itself from the production. This raised concerns not only about the ethics of the video but also about potential copyright infringement, given that a government agency had employed protected content for promotional purposes without approval.

Human rights advocates and migrant support groups denounced the video as stigmatizing vulnerable communities, warning that it risked normalizing prejudice and reducing public empathy. Legal and media scholars added that turning law enforcement into entertainment undermines both due process and government credibility. Even some who support stricter immigration enforcement admitted the presentation was inappropriate and damaging to public trust.

Politically, the incident has amplified debates around U.S. immigration policy. Lawmakers and civil rights organizations have demanded an investigation into how the video was produced and who was responsible. Some have suggested legal accountability should be pursued.

The controversy highlights two major issues: the misuse of copyrighted material and the broader challenge of how government agencies communicate sensitive policies in the digital age. While the video has already sparked widespread backlash, it also serves as a warning that entertainment-style messaging—especially when tied to human lives and rights—can seriously undermine institutional integrity.