印度籍男性難民因強暴20多歲韓國男子被判4年有期徒刑

2025-10-12

近日,韓國社會震驚於一起涉及外籍難民的性侵案件。韓國法院依據強姦罪,正式判處一名印度籍男性難民四年有期徒刑,並規定他在出獄後五年內不得從事任何與兒童及青少年有關的工作。

根據韓國媒體報導,這名被告於去年在京畿道地區對一名二十多歲的韓國男子實施性侵。案發後,被害人立刻報警並接受身體檢驗,最終在其內褲上驗出屬於該名印度難民的DNA證據。雖然證據確鑿,但被告全程否認犯罪行為,態度強硬、毫無悔意。

法院在審理過程中嚴詞譴責被告,指出其行為不僅嚴重侵犯受害者的人身自主權與尊嚴,也破壞了社會對難民制度的信任。法官在宣判時表示,被告犯後不認罪、毫無反省,態度極為惡劣,因此難以從輕量刑。最終,法院依強姦罪判處有期徒刑四年,並附帶限制條件,禁止他在刑滿出獄後的五年內接觸或從事任何與青少年或兒童相關的工作,以防止再犯。

此案在韓國社會引起廣泛討論。部分民眾對法院的判決表示支持,認為這是保障性暴力受害者權益的重要一步;但也有輿論指出,案件可能進一步惡化韓國社會對外籍難民的觀感,呼籲政府在處理類似案件時應兼顧司法正義與人權保護,避免將個別犯罪行為與整體難民群體畫上等號。

Recently, South Korea was shaken by a sexual assault case involving a male refugee from India. A South Korean court found the man guilty of rape and sentenced him to four years in prison. In addition, the court ruled that for five years after his release, he will be prohibited from working in any job involving children or adolescents.

According to South Korean media reports, the incident occurred last year in Gyeonggi Province, where the Indian refugee sexually assaulted a Korean man in his twenties. The victim immediately reported the assault to the police and underwent forensic testing. DNA evidence found on the victim’s underwear matched that of the Indian suspect. Despite the clear forensic evidence, the defendant persistently denied the crime throughout the investigation and trial, showing no remorse.

During the sentencing, the court harshly condemned the perpetrator, stating that his actions not only violated the victim’s physical autonomy and dignity but also undermined public trust in the refugee protection system. The judge emphasized that the defendant’s complete lack of repentance and defiant attitude made leniency impossible. Consequently, the court imposed a four-year prison sentence and a five-year post-release employment restriction to prevent potential reoffending.

The case has sparked widespread discussion across South Korean society. Many citizens supported the ruling, viewing it as a necessary step to uphold justice for sexual assault victims. However, others expressed concern that the case could further worsen public perceptions of refugees. Human rights advocates urged the government and media to ensure that justice is served without stigmatizing the entire refugee community for the crimes of an individual.