2025年11月18日，有關一宗騙婚案件的審理進展引起社會廣泛關注。據報導，一名女子涉嫌通過虛構家庭背景與財務狀況，欺騙他人結婚並獲取財物。在庭審中揭露，她曾聘請演員假扮父母，以增強自己家庭背景的真實性，其陪嫁財產包括銀行存款單和金條也全部為偽造。這些行為顯示，她在策劃與實施騙婚過程中具有明顯的預謀與欺騙意圖。

庭審現場，扮演“父親”的演員表示，自己已不再從事表演相關工作，僅是應女子要求參與演出，以配合騙婚計劃。這一細節進一步揭示騙婚行為的精心安排和社會影響，也引發媒體與公眾對婚姻信任與法律防範的關注。

值得注意的是，女子在庭審中態度強硬，對於退還騙取的財物與求得被害人諒解均表現出不悔意。她明確表示“不退贓不要諒解”，凸顯案件中受害者維權的困難，以及司法程序在追索贓款、保障受害人權益方面的重要性。

此案件的曝光，引發社會對婚姻安全和財產保護的廣泛討論。專家指出，隨著婚戀交易中涉及財務數據、財產證明的增多，公眾需提高警惕，對婚姻背景進行必要核查，防範類似騙婚行為發生。同時，法律界亦提醒，對於策劃與實施騙婚的行為，應依據刑法相關規定追究刑事責任，以維護社會公平與法律尊嚴。

On November 18, 2025, new developments in the trial of a marriage fraud case drew widespread public attention. According to reports, a woman allegedly fabricated her family background and financial status to deceive another party into marriage and obtain property. During the court hearing, it was revealed that she had hired actors to pose as her parents in order to make her background appear more credible. Her supposed dowry items, including bank deposit slips and gold bars, were also entirely forged. These actions demonstrated clear premeditation and intent to deceive throughout the planning and execution of the fraud.

During the trial, the actor who played her “father” testified that he was no longer working in the entertainment industry and had only participated at the woman’s request to support her fraudulent scheme. This detail further highlighted the elaborate nature of the deception and its broader social implications, sparking discussions in the media and public about trust in marriage and the need for stronger legal safeguards.

Notably, the woman showed a hardened attitude in court, expressing no remorse regarding the return of the illicitly obtained property or seeking forgiveness from the victim. She explicitly stated that she would “neither return the stolen assets nor seek understanding,” underscoring the victim’s difficulties in defending their rights as well as the importance of judicial procedures in recovering illegal gains and protecting victims’ interests.

The case’s exposure has triggered extensive discussions about marital security and the protection of personal property. Experts pointed out that as financial documents and asset claims become increasingly intertwined with modern matchmaking and marriage arrangements, the public must remain vigilant and conduct necessary background checks to prevent similar frauds. Legal professionals also emphasized that those who plan and carry out marriage fraud should be held criminally accountable under the relevant provisions of criminal law, in order to uphold social fairness and the dignity of the legal system.