這起備受關注的司法案件在2026年1月9日進入第四度開庭審理階段，藝人王大陸首度與其直播主女友、外界熟知的暱稱「小木頭」，一同現身法院出庭應訊，兩人同框的畫面也引發媒體與社群高度關注。隨著庭訊推進，案件細節逐漸浮上檯面，也讓外界得以一窺這起被稱為「案外案」的複雜內幕。

根據庭訊內容，本案並非單純源自王大陸先前涉及的「閃兵案」，而是延伸出一宗涉嫌違反《個人資料保護法》的刑事案件。檢方指控，王大陸在私人糾紛中，疑似透過非正規管道取得他人個資，構成不法行為。這次開庭的關鍵在於其女友首次以證人身分出庭作證，並親口說明事件起因與過程。

女友在庭上證實，她先前遭遇詐騙，損失金額高達新台幣四百多萬元。為了協助她討回這筆款項，王大陸曾主動出面協調，並建立一個僅有三人的通訊群組。該群組名稱被取為「失去的！一定要討回來」，由王大陸擔任群主，成員包括王大陸本人、女友，以及一名家境富裕、被外界稱為「富二代」的男性友人。這個群組被檢方視為後續一連串行動的起點。

檢方指控的核心在於，王大陸疑似透過該名富二代友人，轉而聯繫熟識的警官與黑幫人士，包括被點名的四海幫堂主，非法查詢特定對象的個人資料。藉由這些資料，相關人士得以掌握被認定為「欠債者」的行蹤，進而進行所謂的討債行為。檢方認為，這種行為已明顯逾越法律界線，不僅涉及個資濫用，也牽扯警紀與黑幫介入的高度敏感問題。

面對指控，王大陸在庭上態度相對保守，對於「非法取得個資」的罪名並未認罪。他辯稱，自己已不清楚是否曾實際委託警官協助查詢資料，甚至表示「已經忘記了相關細節」。王大陸的說法強調，他的原意只是希望循正常報案與司法途徑處理詐騙問題，而非有意進行非法肉搜或動用灰色勢力。然而，這樣的說詞是否能被法官採信，仍有待後續審理與證據釐清。

值得注意的是，這起案件的社會觀感也受到王大陸先前司法紀錄的影響。早在本案之前，他已因妨害兵役相關罪名認罪，並於2025年3月依法入伍服替代役。如今又捲入涉及個資與黑白勢力的案外案，使得其公眾形象與法律風險再度升高。

整體而言，這起案件不僅牽涉藝人私生活與感情糾紛，更觸及個資保護、警政倫理與地下勢力介入等敏感議題。隨著審理持續進行，法院將進一步釐清王大陸在整起事件中的實際角色與責任歸屬，社會各界也將持續關注此案的最終判決走向。

This high-profile judicial case entered its fourth hearing on January 9, 2026, marking the first time that entertainer Wang Dalu appeared in court alongside his livestreaming girlfriend, publicly known by the nickname “Xiao Mutou.” The sight of the couple together drew intense media and social media attention. As the proceedings unfolded, more details of the case emerged, providing the public with a glimpse into what has been described as a highly complex “side case” extending from prior incidents.

According to court proceedings, this case does not simply stem from Wang Dalu’s earlier involvement in the so-called “Flash Soldier Case,” but has evolved into a criminal matter involving alleged violations of the Personal Data Protection Act. Prosecutors allege that Wang, in the course of a private dispute, may have unlawfully obtained personal information through informal channels, constituting illegal conduct. A key point of this hearing was the girlfriend’s first appearance as a witness, where she provided firsthand testimony regarding the origins and development of the events.

In court, she confirmed that she had previously been defrauded, suffering a financial loss exceeding NT$4 million. To assist her in recovering the money, Wang Dalu took the initiative to coordinate efforts and established a private communication group of only three people. The group was named “Lost! Must Get It Back,” with Wang serving as the group leader. Its members included Wang himself, his girlfriend, and a wealthy male friend often described as a “second-generation rich” individual. Prosecutors consider this group the starting point for the subsequent series of actions.

The prosecution’s central allegation is that Wang, allegedly through this wealthy friend, contacted acquaintances including police officers and underworld figures, notably the head of the Four Seas Gang, to illegally access personal information of targeted individuals. Using this information, these individuals could track the movements of those deemed “debtors” and carry out debt collection activities. Prosecutors argue that such actions clearly overstepped legal boundaries, involving not only the misuse of personal data but also highly sensitive issues of police misconduct and organized crime involvement.

Facing the charges, Wang Dalu maintained a relatively cautious stance, refusing to plead guilty to the accusations of illegally obtaining personal data. He stated that he was unsure whether he had actually requested assistance from police officers and even claimed he had “forgotten the relevant details.” Wang emphasized that his original intent was merely to address the fraud through official reporting and legal channels, not to intentionally conduct illegal investigations or leverage gray-area forces. Whether this explanation will be accepted by the court remains to be determined as the trial proceeds and evidence is further examined.

It is worth noting that public perception of this case is influenced by Wang Dalu’s prior legal record. Before this incident, he had already pleaded guilty to offenses related to obstructing military service and had entered alternative service in March 2025. Being now embroiled in a side case involving personal data and both lawful and illicit actors has further heightened the scrutiny of his public image and legal risks.

Overall, this case not only involves the private life and romantic disputes of a celebrity but also touches on sensitive issues including personal data protection, police ethics, and the involvement of underground forces. As the trial continues, the court will further clarify Wang Dalu’s actual role and legal responsibilities, while society at large remains closely attentive to the final outcome.